DOCTORS for
EXCELLENCE in
CHIROPRACTIC
EDUCATION

Join us in our fight to preserve and perpetuate
traditional chiropractic education

 BREAKING NEWS

BRIEF OF AMICUS CURIAE DOCTORS FOR EXCELLENCE IN CHIROPRACTIC EDUCATION

Click here to read the Life University lawsuit

Click here to read the Palmer lawsuit

The Future Direction of Chiropractic: The Battle Lines Have Been Drawn

A fierce battle is currently raging for control of the chiropractic profession. On one side, the CCE is attempting to forcibly alter the very basis of the profession by mandating that the core curriculum of our chiropractic institutions include more and more conventional medical procedures.  On the other side, those institutions providing traditional subluxation-based curricula are desperately fighting to maintain control of their own teaching standards.

Doctors for Excellence in Chiropractic Education (DECE) has led the way in uncovering what has gone awry. DECE's generous financial supporters from around the nation have so far enabled us to dispatch lawyers and investigators to Wisconsin, Arizona and Washington, D.C. to obtain and review board minutes, public documents, and corporate filings made by CCE. The evidence uncovered during this mammoth undertaking has revealed repeated illegal corporate actions carefully calculated to allow those in power to maintain their control. Allowing the CCE to win this battle is tantamount to allowing chiropractic to forever change into a pseudo-medical profession.

While DECE’s legal research was instrumental in both the Life and Palmer lawsuits, much more needs to be done. DECE is still very much in need of active support and contributions to keep this effort going. Please read the following commentary about the two lawsuits, and consider joining us and contributing to this vitally important cause. 

Palmer & Life vs. CCE – Nothing to do with Educational Standards



 

The Council on Chiropractic Education’s (CCE) revocation of Life University’s accreditation based on alleged inadequate educational standards has now exploded into a national chiropractic accreditation crisis.  Two massive lawsuits from Palmer Universities and Life University detailing illegal corporate actions have left the accrediting agency reeling and calling into question its future credibility and ability to survive.  Both suits are being staunchly supported by the Doctors for Excellence in Chiropractic Education (DECE), a nationwide group of chiropractors and chiropractic patients dedicated to preserving traditional chiropractic teachings and methods.  According to DECE spokesman Donald Hirsh, D.C., "CCE’s illegal actions left the schools no choice but to take legal action to force the CCE to follow its own rules."

The Palmer suit, filed on December 5, 2002 in Jefferson County (Wisconsin) Circuit Court, names as defendants the CCE Corporation, as well as individuals Paul Walker, Executive Vice President of the CCE; Reed Phillips, President of the CCE Board of Directors; James Winterstein, Chairman of CCE’s Corporate Board; and Joseph Brimhall, Chairman of CCE’s Commission on Accreditation.  The suit asserts five causes of action in which Palmer alleges that the CCE, presently the chiropractic profession's sole specialized educational accrediting agency, deprived Palmer of its rights of representation in an illegal 2002 corporate restructuring.

The Life suit, a federal lawsuit filed on January 3, 2003 in U.S. District Court in Georgia, also names as defendants the CCE Corporation, as well as Paul Walker individually.  Life’s suit is far more sweeping in its scope and challenges not only the illegal 2002 corporate restructuring, but also the manner in which Life was denied its legal due process during both the reaccredidation and appeal procedures.  The lawsuit details how CCE acted unfairly during these procedures and asks federal Judge Charles Moye to grant an injunction to reinstate Life as an accredited institution.

The 2002 illegal corporate restructuring detailed in both lawsuits challenges CCE's attempt to illegally dissolve itself as a Wisconsin corporation and become and operate as an Arizona corporation with new rules.  The lawsuits note that these actions were taken in violation of the CCE's own bylaws and articles of incorporation.

The lawsuits point out that Article 10 of CCE’s original Articles of Incorporation ("Articles") provides that CCE "is to have no members who are not directors."  CCE members are the 16 accredited chiropractic institutions in the United States.  Each member (that is, each CCE-accredited institution) is entitled to designate one representative to sit on the CCE Board of Directors (BOD).  Prior to January 1999, all 16 CCE accredited institutions had a designated voting member on the BOD.

Both lawsuits detail however, that without properly or legally amending the Articles, CCE’s bylaws were revised in January 1999.  Among the revisions was the reduction of membership representation on the BOD from sixteen (one from each member institution) to seven (all nominated by the Association of Chiropractic Colleges).  What was previously known as the BOD, was now renamed the "Corporate Board."  As did the original BOD, the new Corporate Board included all institutions as designated representatives.  Although the new board of directors (which only included seven institutions) was granted certain powers, the illegally revised 1999 bylaws did continue to authorize only the 16 member Corporate Board to "decide matters pertaining to incorporation and/or revision of the bylaws," and then only by a two-thirds majority vote.  The revised 1999 bylaws also authorized the Corporate Board alone to elect the seven institutional board members by a majority vote.  This provision was important to the 16 accredited colleges as it insured that a small minority of CCE members could never unilaterally change CCE bylaws or its corporate structure without at least a two-thirds majority vote of all 16 accredited institutions.

On January 13, 2002, the new BOD proposed that the CCE dissolve itself as a Wisconsin corporation, and reincorporate in Arizona.  The BOD also proposed that this new Arizona corporation further revise the 1999 bylaws so as to transfer power relating to bylaws, corporate structuring, and election of BOD members away from the 16-member Corporate Board and place those powers in the sole control of its own BOD.  The vote on this matter was scheduled for the March 12, 2002 CCE meeting.

Just days before the March 12, 2002 meeting however, James Winterstein in his capacity as Chairman of the Corporate Board, inexplicably ruled that one representative each from Palmer’s two separate institutions, and Cleveland’s two separate institution would no longer be allowed to sit on the Corporate Board.  This ruling resulted in a loss of representation for these two schools by denying them the ability to vote on the BOD’s proposal and lowered the number of members of the Corporate Board from 16 to 14.

Despite not allowing one of Palmer’s and one of Cleveland’s institutions to vote, the BOD’s proposal still did not gain the 2/3 majority necessary for passage in accordance with its own Articles.  Of the 14 institutions permitted to vote, Palmer, Cleveland, Life, Sherman, Life West and Parker all voted against the proposal.  Because ten affirmative votes would have been necessary for a two-thirds majority, and there were only eight affirmative votes, the BOD proposal failed.

Following the failure of the BOD’s proposal, defendants Winterstein, Phillips, and Brimhall wrote to the 14 institutions during April 2002 incredulously stating it was their interpretation of the articles that the BOD proposal did not require a two-thirds vote for passage.  The letter asked each of the 14 institutions if they agreed.  Of the 14 institutions, only the same eight institutions that voted in favor of the proposal replied that they did agree with the new interpretation.  Based on their agreement, defendants Winterstein, Phillips, Brimhall and Walker recommended that the BOD assume the powers that the 1999 bylaws gave the Corporate Board.

At the May 13, 2002 meeting, the Board adopted the defendant’s recommendation and dissolved the CCE as a Wisconsin corporation and reincorporated as an Arizona corporation.  The new corporation granted Palmer and Cleveland only one vote each total in place of the one vote for each institution they were previously designated.  In essence, CCE had been operating illegally in violation of its own articles and bylaws since 1999.  Three years later in 2002, its BOD proceeded to disregard even these invalid bylaws in an effort to gain additional power and control.

Both lawsuits note that illegal actions led to the illegal reincorporating of the CCE.  Palmer asks that the court reverse the dissolution of the CCE as a Wisconsin corporation, restore the CCE governance to a condition in which there are "no members who are not directors" and finally, restore separate voting status for each of Palmer’s two institutions on the Board.  Life asks the federal judge for an immediate injunction that would restore the CCE to its original structure in 1999 and reverse any actions, including its loss of accreditation, that have occurred illegally since 1999.  Life’s suit also details numerous efforts made by the school to resolve any alleged accreditation deficiencies during the accreditation appeal process and the refusal by the CCE Board of Directors, and particularly Paul Walker, to address any of its repeated calls for clarification of the issues.

Life’s lawsuit also details the rationale for CCE’s illegal actions.  It notes that those seeking to transform the chiropractic profession away from its traditional subluxation-based principles towards a diagnosis-based medical model have always controlled the CCE.  Those in power realized that once Palmer’s new Florida institution became accredited, its additional vote would result for the first time in majority control switching to those that advocated the traditional subluxation-based chiropractic model.  Rather than accept this inevitable outcome, CCE’s leadership attempted numerous illegal activities to maintain its control.  The illegal ruling by James Winterstein, President of National College, and the other defendants that resulted in Palmer’s and Cleveland’s loss of votes was a calculated plan to maintain the present voting majority by removing the voting privileges of two traditional schools.  The illegal corporate restructuring of the CCE, and changing of the bylaws by those in power was yet another attempt to maintain their control.  The completely adversarial and nonresponsive appeal process that led to Life’s loss of accreditation was also calculated from the onset to put Life out of business.

Dr. Hirsh of DECE points out that "these lawsuits have nothing to do with the application of appropriate educational standards, and in all actuality are really about the political aspirations of the current CCE leadership to dictate the future direction of the chiropractic profession."  Hirsh further states, "the illegal actions taken by those in control of CCE have made a mockery of chiropractic educational standards and have embarrassed the entire chiropractic profession."  He notes that DECE is publicly calling on defendants Paul Walker, Reed Phillips, James Winterstein, and Joseph Brimhall to immediately resign their CCE positions "to spare the profession further public embarrassment."  He concludes,  "The only way for the chiropractic profession’s accrediting agency to regain its credibility is to remove from power those who would use the agency to further their own political agenda."

Click here to read the Life University lawsuit 
Click here to read the Palmer lawsuit
Click here to join us


Doctors for Excellence in Chiropractic Education
177 NE 167 Street, North Miami Beach, FL  33162